Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Roger Deakins

Roger Deakins


Roger Antony Deakins is an English cinematographer (DP) and he was born in May 24, 1949 (age 63) in Torquay (Devon), England. He had his schooling in the National Film and Television School, Bath School of Art and Design. As he graduated from his school he found jobs as a cinematographer doing short documentaries around the world. His first feature film in America is Mountains of the Moon(1990). The developed trademarks that Roger Deakins has is: Silhouette lighting technique and the contrast of light on the actors, only uses spherical lenses, and frequently works with the Coen Brothers.


He has been the cinematographer on some of the most iconic and visually beautiful films of the past 20 years, such as The Shawshank Redemption (Frank Darabont, 1994), Fargo (The Coen Brothers, 1996), No Country For Old Men (The Coen Brothers, 2007) True Grit (The Coen Brothers, 2010) and the new James Bond film, Skyfall (Sam Mendes, 2012). These are just a few off his incredible body of work.


Directed by the Coen brothers:

                                       Nominated for 10 Oscars. Another 67 wins & 
  37 nominations...







Sunday, February 24, 2013

Film Noir

 Blog #2

Definitely, film noir captured audiences attention with it's dark and powerful scenes. As seen in American Cinema documentary: Film Noir, the director and producer of Force of Evil, Abraham Polonsky, said, "If the writers, actors, are reflecting this general sense of jeopardy in life, which is what exists in all film noir, then it is a correct representation of the anxiety caused by the system... how circumstances become more and more unendurable and yet you must endure"(6:00). In the film The Postman Always Rings Twice, the two characters Cora Smith and John Garfield played by Frank Chambers and Lana Turner threw themselves into a predicament in which would lead to their stressful way of living. Polonsky hit the nail on the head when describing the feeling of Film Noir. The Postman Always Rings Twice was filled with darkness, tension, and circumstances building on each other till the very end. Frank Chambers handled the hand he was dealt with the strength he could, and still persevering through the wavering relationship with Cora Smith. Anxiety was filled throughout the film sexually, and non sexually. As events roll on, it seems hopeless and tiresome to deal with relationships, society, as well as personal emotions. 





Now, Film Noir contains different stock characters. One of the personalities contains a strong female character named as the femme fatale. Scholar Janey Place stated, "She's very smart, powerful, and she's extremely sexual... The spider woman of the Film Noir is identified in obvious ways. First, through her sexuality. They tend to be characters with long hair, tight clothes, long fingernails that are actually composed as claws. They often smoke, which has always been the sign of the woman of loose morals...they have visual dominance." Cora is very strong, sexual, and in control of the situation between herself, John, and her husband. The story was essentially moved and influence by Cora's ambition to have the store and John to herself. Her selfishness led to her husbands death as she complied to the murder with John Garfield. Cora Smith in general fits the mold that Janey Place describes. However, Marie Windsor describes the femme fatale as "a woman that's getting a man into bed and then into trouble." This description does not match Cora Smith because she never forced herself on John, or got him into trouble because of their relationship. So she fits the mold in appearance and personality, but not the motive or actions against a man. She's the typical Femme fatale with large tweaks in her relationship with John.



As you see in the previous pictures, the contrast between shadows and light are very prevolent. It gives the scenes an atmosphere of a dark ominous cloud over the actors. As you see in the picture of Cora, there is little decorations in the room. However, the shadows add to the look of the walls and stairs around her. The shadows and light bring a certain attention to the actors as they stick out in the scene, a certain feeling as if they are slowly being engulfed by darkness as you see in the later seen when they are in the car. Much of the scenes are filmed with extreme contrast, even in the shadows. For example, Force of Evil had an extreme contrast in light and shadow where it looks as if the character has no where to go and trapped in a sense and can't get out. However, directors also use outdoor settings in other Film Noir because the controlled lighting and the deep darkness that you will notice in the background leaving the audience to imagine what is in the distance. The streets gives a dark and mysterious path for the characters. Deep focus is also used where there are people or objects in the foreground and background to where it creates a unique effect. It basically created to equally share attention and showing characters in environment. It also was a money saver by being able to have two characters or more sharing a shot and carrying on a conversation without having to use more than one shot and not looking at each other. The music also creates environment for the characters, it would be dramatic for an action seen, or romantic music will go on to create tension in the scenes. The music created ambiance for the content in the scene. Film Noir has so many elements that makes it unique and it makes me want to watch it. 
Force of Evil: extreme contrast
As filming technology has advanced to color and better quality in film, Film Noir has become a dying craft. However, there are films made in tribute to Film Noir and the are known as "neo-nior". Movies born into color still being made based on the style. Martin Scorsese made a film called Mean Streets and  he tried to make the film as close to the Film Noir. The style, of course, has a lot of shadows and darkness, design is not too heavy, and it is showing the reality of life. The difference in "neo-noir" and the classic style is that the color brings the picture of reality, since the black and white pictures were showed that it is an obvious world of fantasy. As color comes into the film industry, a new level of reality enters the movies. For example, Blade Runner dealt with a fantasy of the future, however the style of Film Noir was demonstrated through the film. The mise-en-scene of playing with shadows, the dark concept of people wanting to meet their creator and to live longer or creating life and then  destroying it, the crime and moral values, and the dark seductive characters of the "replicants" and humans living on a fine line, spread throughout the film. The music in the film is dramatic and fit the content of the scene and even develop the future ambiance. The Blade Runner was, overall, an interesting movie. It even reminded me of the style of The Fifth Element, but with a whole level of darkness and shadows intertwined.





Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Film Criteria

Ahhh, movies. The movies that I have noticed to catch my attention is first the movie's introduction. The camera quality and the creative movement are the elements I initially look for. For example, the award winning movie Les Miserable had a wonderful introduction into the first scene. The camera contained wonderful graphics and captured the attention of the audience. The storm, and the boat being pulled into port by men was ment to portray danger and risk to the working prisoners. The camera work that moved over the scenery to the prisoners perfectly developed the atmosphere and beginning introduction to one of the main characters. I believe a movie is good when a movie totally captures the audiences attention to a point where they are was completely lost in the story. The first time seeing Les Miserable my sisters and I cried throughout the movie, in the theatre I might add. So much so that at the very end I remember saying "I feel like I was just punched in the face with emotion." I also overheard a woman who had watched the movie twice and cried even more than the second time she saw it. Clearly, the movie captures the audience and achieved a very powerful catharsis. And now the movie has won multiple awards and I absolutely believe they deserved it. So the beginning scenes, video quality, and the power to draw the audience into the movie are the key elements, in my book, to determine how good a movie is.



Although the cinema world has advanced and evolved from past films, we should never forget about the motion pictures that started it all. Le voyage dans la lune (A Trip to the Moon), and 1902 (dir. Georges Méliès) andThe Great Train Robbery, 1903 (dir. Edwin S. Porter) are ones that built up to todays great movies. A Trip to The Moon didn't express itself as well as The Great Train Robbery in terms of introduction. It was hard to follow A Trip to The Moon compared to The Great Train Robbery. Since the movie was about a fantasy and people traveling to the moon, it was harder to grasp who the people in the shot were, what they were doing as well as what was going on in the scenes at various points in the short film. The Great Train Robbery was more realistic and the character roles were easily established in the very begining. It was not hard to follow at all. So The Great Train Robbery had a better time at getting my attention. Video quality is kind of pointless to look at with these films because they are the early ones, but, again, The Great Train Robbery was better in the area of continuity and knowing where the scene is gonna be. The Great Train Robbery had better all around filming, but then again A Trip to the Moon was very creative and bold in the new way of editing film. Plus, The Great Train Robbery had come after A Trip to the Moon. I enjoyed them both although, to be honest, didn't always have my full attention. I guess you can say I'm desensitized by the quick-paced filming of today. 

Two of my favorite movies of all time are The Producers(2005) and The Phantom of the Opera(2004). The Producers first had a panning over New York and Broadway and was humorous as they entered the first song "Opening Night". It clearly shown that this is taken place in New York and is about a producer who had made some bad broadway musicals. The lyrics in "Opening Night" were funny and took people by surprise by the body language and facial expression of the people singing. It immediately captured my attention and the surprising comedy was continuous throughout the movie. The quality of the movie was bright and vibrant and the angling of the shots were straight and to the point. The ending was surprising as well as the introduction was. Brilliant movie!



The Phantom of the Opera also has a very gripping opening scene of where it is in the quality of an old black and white movie and the auctioneer introduces the story of the Phantom of the Opera and the chandeleer. Then time seems to role backwards and the chandelier is lifted into the air while the quality or style of the shot changes as the scene goes back in time to show the opera's former glory. The music as well contributes to capturing our attention and I absolutely adore the graphics that goes along with it. This also has continuity throughout the movie with quality and an added twist at the end. 




If you can tell, both my favorite movies are musicals. Musicals just do something that other movies can't. I do have my preferences, but who doesn't. I love them all.